Navigation bar
  Print document Start Previous page
 79 of 178 
Next page End  

79
The wind has dropped, and the sun burns more fiercely than ever.
"Have you really never been to a ball before, Leila? But. my child, how too weird - " cried the Sheridan
girls.
The resultative implication of the perfect in the first of the above examples can be graphically shown by the
diagnostic transformation, which is not applicable to the second example:
> The sun burns more fiercely than ever as a result of the wind having dropped.
At the same time, the plain resultative semantics quite evidently appears as a particular variety of the general
transmissive meaning, by which a posterior event is treated as a successor of an anterior event on very broad
lines of connection.
Recognizing all the merits of the aspect approach in question, however, we clearly see its two serious
drawbacks. The first of them is that, while emphasizing the aspective side of the function of the perfect, it
underestimates its temporal side, convincingly demonstrated by the tense view of the perfect described above.
The second drawback, though, is just the one characteristic of the tense view, repeated on the respectively
different material: the described aspective interpretation of the perfect fails to strictly formulate its oppositional
nature, the categorial status of the perfect being left undefined.
The third grammatical interpretation of the perfect was the "tense-aspect blend view": in accord with this
interpretation the perfect is recognized as a form of double temporal-aspective character, similar to the
continuous. The tense-aspect interpretation of the perfect was developed in the works of I.P. Ivanova.
According to I.P. Ivanova, the two verbal forms expressing temporal and aspective functions in a blend are
contrasted against the indefinite form as their common counterpart of neutralized aspective properties.
The achievement of the tense-aspect view of the perfect is the fact that it demonstrates the actual double
nature of the analysed verbal form, its inherent connection with both temporal and aspective spheres of verbal
semantics. Thus, as far as the perfect is concerned, the tense-aspect view overcomes the one-sided approach to
it peculiar both to the first and the second of the noted conceptions.
Indeed, the temporal meaning of the perfect is quite apparent in constructions like the following:
I have lived in this city long enough, I haven't met Charlie for years.
The actual time expressed 'by the perfect verbal forms used in the examples can be made explicit by time-
test questions:
How long have you lived in this city? For how long haven't you met Charlie?
Now, the purely aspective semantic component of the perfect form will immediately be made prominent if
the sentences were continued like that:
I have lived in this city long enough to show you all that is worth seeing here. I haven't met Charlie for
years, and can hardly recognize him in a crowd.
The aspective function of the perfect verbal forms in both sentences, in its turn, can easily be revealed by
aspect-test questions:
What can you do as a result of your having lived in this city for years? What is the consequence of your not
having met Charlie for years?
However, comprehensively exposing the two different sides of the integral semantics of the perfect, the
tense-aspect conception loses sight of its categorial nature altogether, since it leaves undisclosed how the
grammatical function of the perfect is effected in contrast to the continuous or indefinite, as well as how the
"categorial blend" of the perfect-continuous is contrasted against its three counterparts, i.e. the perfect, the
continuous, the indefinite.
As we see, the three described interpretations of the perfect, actually complementing one another, have
given in combination a broad and profound picture of the semantical content of the perfect verbal forms, though
all of them have failed to explicitly explain the grammatical category within the structure of which the perfect is
enabled to fulfil its distinctive function.
The categorial individuality of the perfect was shown as a result of study conducted by A.I. Smirnitsky. His
conception of the perfect, the fourth in our enumeration, may be called the "time correlation view", to use the
explanatory name he gave to the identified category. What was achieved by this' brilliant thinker, is an explicit
demonstration of the fact that the perfect form, by means of its oppositional mark, builds up its own category,
different from both the "tense"   (present - past - future)   and   the   "aspect"   (continuous-indefinite), and not
reducible to either of them. The functional content of the category of "time correlation" («временная отнесен-
ность») was defined as priority expressed by the perfect forms in the present, past or future contrasted against
the non-expression of priority by the non-perfect forms. The immediate factor that gave cause to A.I.
Сайт создан в системе uCoz